15
edits
(→Senet) |
m (Mardin arch) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:::If you were trying to refute the pointed arch, we cant do that by posting a picture of a circular arch (like Mardin, the picture you posted). | :::If you were trying to refute the pointed arch, we cant do that by posting a picture of a circular arch (like Mardin, the picture you posted). | ||
:::If you disagree please start with quoting the original claim in the quote that you are addressing. This issue will have to wait in any case until and if {{user|Sahab}} comes by. I feel the existing article text does a good job of refuting what is present and its not an emergency to add additional refutation text. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 16:56, 15 July 2015 (PDT) | :::If you disagree please start with quoting the original claim in the quote that you are addressing. This issue will have to wait in any case until and if {{user|Sahab}} comes by. I feel the existing article text does a good job of refuting what is present and its not an emergency to add additional refutation text. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 16:56, 15 July 2015 (PDT) | ||
:::: You said: "We cant do that by posting a picture of a circular arch (like Mardin, the picture you posted)." | |||
:::: Mardin is not a circular arch, it is a flat arch. In fact, it is probably the flattest arch ever produced in the history of architecture.[[User:Tatelyle|Tatelyle]] ([[User talk:Tatelyle|talk]]) 02:03, 23 July 2015 (PDT) |
edits