WikiIslam:Discussions/Visitor Inquiries: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 486: Line 486:
I have to say, I read wikislam and get the overwhelming impression that, rather than a scholarly site meant to serve as a source of accurate info on Islam, that it is a polemic endeavor, a hostile, agenda-driven vehicle...not just in the various glaring innaccuracies, but in the general tone and often unscholarly asides.
I have to say, I read wikislam and get the overwhelming impression that, rather than a scholarly site meant to serve as a source of accurate info on Islam, that it is a polemic endeavor, a hostile, agenda-driven vehicle...not just in the various glaring innaccuracies, but in the general tone and often unscholarly asides.
I am not a Muslim, but I consider it churlish to falsely represent a religion in a negative way. It's un-American. And most people would agree with me.
I am not a Muslim, but I consider it churlish to falsely represent a religion in a negative way. It's un-American. And most people would agree with me.
== ALL LINKS TO VERSES @ usc.edu ARE DEAD ==
ALL LINKS TO VERSES @ usc.edu ARE DEAD. Either a new site must be found, or a possible solution might be to link to an archived version of the pages through one (or more) of the following:
http://'''webcache.googleusercontent.com'''/search?q=cache: [original URL]
https://'''web.archive.org'''/web/*/ [original URL]
http://'''archive.is'''/ [original URL]
20

edits

Navigation menu