Editors, em-bypass-2
4,744
edits
[unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
Prekladator (talk | contribs) |
Prekladator (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
==Conclusions== | ==Conclusions== | ||
* The water to land ratio is not stated in any verse of the Qur'an. So the claim that the Qur'an describes the ratio is a lie. | * The water to land ratio is not stated in any verse of the Qur'an. So the claim that the Qur'an describes the ratio is a lie. | ||
* Ratio of word counts does not imply the ratio of the meanings of the words. This is ridiculous and not scientific in any way. | ** How did Muhammad's companions figure out this information about the land to water ratio, when they had no modern scientists to tell them the actual ratio, so that they could find it in the word counts? And if they did various word counts, then how did they know what counting method to choose, when they didn't know which number they want to get? | ||
** Also the word ''al-bahr'' means "sea" and not water. | * Ratio of word counts does not imply the ratio of occurrences of the meanings of the words in the world. This is ridiculous and not scientific in any way. | ||
** Also the word ''al-bahr'' means "sea" and not water. So it should not include rivers. And the Qur'an talks about rivers (أَنْهَٰرٌ, ''al-anharun'') a lot. | |||
** What other ratios are described this way? Is the moon / earth mass ratio described by the word counts for moon and earth? | |||
* There are floods, icebergs melting.. the ratio of land to water is always changing. But the ratio of the word counts will never change. So even if the Qur'an described the ratio and it was 100% accurate, then it was wrong somewhere in history and will be wrong in the future. Shouldn't the Qur'an rather describe physical or mathematical facts, that are not changing with time? And preferably describe them in a verse and not in word counts, so that we know this is not a coincidence? | |||
==References== | ==References== |