6,633
edits
[checked revision] | [checked revision] |
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Sirat Rasul Allah''' (سيرة رسول الله ''Life of the Messenger of Allah'') is the Arabic term used for the biographies of Prophet [[Muhammad]]. Together the sirat and the [[hadith]] constitute the [[sunnah]] (''way/example'') of the prophet which is an integral part of [[Islam]], forming the basis of many Islamic [[Islamic Law|practices and laws]], including the [[Five Pillars of Islam|Five Pillars]]. | '''Sirat Rasul Allah''' (سيرة رسول الله ''Life of the Messenger of Allah'') is the Arabic term used for the biographies of Prophet [[Muhammad]]. Together the sirat and the [[hadith]] constitute the [[sunnah]] (''way/example'') of the prophet which is an integral part of [[Islam]], forming the basis of many Islamic [[Islamic Law|practices and laws]], including the [[Five Pillars of Islam|Five Pillars]]. | ||
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Yasār (more commonly known simply as ''Ibn Ishaq'')(704-770 AD) was an Arab Muslim historian from Medina, responsible for the ''Sirat Rasul Allah'', a collection of hadith that is arranged in chronological order, forming the earliest and most | Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Yasār (more commonly known simply as ''Ibn Ishaq'') (704-770 AD) was an Arab Muslim historian from Medina, responsible for a book titled - eponymously to the genre - ''Sirat Rasul Allah'', a collection of hadith that is arranged in chronological order, forming the earliest and most relied upon biography of Muhammad. This, along with the [[Qur'an]] and hadith, are sometimes referred to as the [http://www.cspipublishing.com/ Trilogy of Islam], as all major doctrines are found within these three texts. | ||
Ishaq's work has survived through | Ishaq's work, while not available in its original entirety, has survived substantially through the works of his editors, most notably Ibn Hisham and [[Tabari|Ibn Jarir al-Tabari]]. According to Islamic scholar Fred Donner at the University of Chicago, the material in ibn Hisham's and al-Tabari's recensions are "virtually the same".<ref>Donner, Fred McGraw (1998). Narratives of Islamic origins: the beginnings of Islamic historical writing. Darwin Press. p. 132. ISBN 9780878501274</ref> However, some material found in al-Tabari is not preserved by ibn Hisham. For example, al-Tabari includes the episode of the [[Satanic Verses]], while ibn Hisham does not.<ref>Raven, Wim, Sīra and the Qurʾān – Ibn Isḥāq and his editors, Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an. Ed. Jane Dammen McAuliffe. Vol. 5. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers, 2006. p29-51.</ref><ref>Cf., Ibn Ishaq [Guillaume's reconstruction, at 165-167] and al-Tabari [SUNY edition, at VI: 107-112]</ref> | ||
The majority of Islamic scholars, past and present, approve of Ibn Ishaq's sira, as well as those of Ibn Hisham, Tabari, and Ibn Saa'd. | |||
{{Core Scripture}} | {{Core Scripture}} |