4,686
edits
The Massacre of the Banu Qurayzah: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Massacre of the Banu Qurayzah (view source)
Revision as of 20:14, 13 January 2021
, 13 January 2021→Modern Views and Perspectives
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
==Modern Views and Perspectives== | ==Modern Views and Perspectives== | ||
<center><youtube>UZE1N56fswY</youtube></center> | |||
The most common Muslim argument is that Muhammad was dealing with treachery and he had taken the maximum punitive actions against it. But this alleged treachery on Banu Qurayza’s part is very hard to accept for a rational mind. To be treacherous, Banu Qurayza must have joined the confederate army who had come to attack the Muslims. If that were the case (had Banu Qurayza joined the Meccan army) it would have ended in the total eradication of Muslims. But Abu Sufyan's (the Meccan chief’s) words before retreating, testifies Banu Qurayza did not ally with the Meccans in a war against the Muslims. To quote Ibn Ishaq: | The most common Muslim argument is that Muhammad was dealing with treachery and he had taken the maximum punitive actions against it. But this alleged treachery on Banu Qurayza’s part is very hard to accept for a rational mind. To be treacherous, Banu Qurayza must have joined the confederate army who had come to attack the Muslims. If that were the case (had Banu Qurayza joined the Meccan army) it would have ended in the total eradication of Muslims. But Abu Sufyan's (the Meccan chief’s) words before retreating, testifies Banu Qurayza did not ally with the Meccans in a war against the Muslims. To quote Ibn Ishaq: | ||