Karen Armstrong: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Karen Armstrong (view source)

Revision as of 23:48, 4 April 2022

3,726 bytes removed ,  4 April 2022
Replaced with better quality new source, removed dead links
[checked revision][checked revision]
(Replaced with better quality new source, removed dead links)
 
Line 5: Line 5:


==Criticism==
==Criticism==
In a survey of recent scholarship on the life of Muhammad, Tilman Nagel mentions Armstrong's writings as an example of work based on Islamic hagiography:
{{Quote|Tilman Nagel, Muhammad's Mission, p. 263<ref>Tilman Nagel, ''Muhammad's Mission: Religion, Politics and Power at the birth of Islam''. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 2020. p. 263</ref>|"They range from gushingly infatuated narratives inspired by the tradition of Islamic hagiography (examples: Karen Armstrong, Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet [New York: HarperCollins, 1992] and Martin Lings, Muhammad: His Life Based on the earliest sources...".}}


Some of Armstrong's work have been described as "strikingly" anti-Semitic.<ref>Andrea Levin - [http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=4&x_outlet=28&x_article=83 Karen Armstrong’s Unscholarly Prejudices] - Jerusalem Post, Febuary 2, 2001</ref> Her revisionist approach to discussing history has won her the praise of many readers, while earning her criticism from various historians including; Dr. Alfred Andrea,<ref> Andrea, A. J. - The Crusades in Perspective: The Crusades in Modern Islamic Perspective History Compass, 2003</ref> Dr. James Powell,<ref name="DJMP">Dr. James M. Powell - [http://www.hmml.org/centers/malta/publications/Lecture.html Crusading 1099-1999: Inaugural Lecture, Malta Study Center Lecture Series] - Presented at Saint John's University, Collegeville, MN, October 28, 1999</ref> Dr. Thomas Madden,<ref>Dr. Thomas Madden - [http://www.americanoutlook.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article_detail&id=1691 Crusades of History and Politics] - Hudson Institute, Spring 2002</ref> and the Israeli historian Efraim Karsh,<ref name="TPS">Efraim Karsh - [http://www.nysun.com/arts/perfect-surrender/40266/ The Perfect Surrender] - The New York Sun, September 25, 2006</ref> head of Mediterranean Studies at King's College London, who comments:
Some of Armstrong's work have been described as "strikingly" anti-Semitic.<ref>Andrea Levin - [http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=4&x_outlet=28&x_article=83 Karen Armstrong’s Unscholarly Prejudices] - Jerusalem Post, Febuary 2, 2001</ref> Her revisionist approach to discussing history has won her the praise of many readers, while earning her criticism from various historians including; Dr. Alfred Andrea,<ref> Andrea, A. J. - The Crusades in Perspective: The Crusades in Modern Islamic Perspective History Compass, 2003</ref> Dr. James Powell,<ref name="DJMP">Dr. James M. Powell - [http://www.hmml.org/centers/malta/publications/Lecture.html Crusading 1099-1999: Inaugural Lecture, Malta Study Center Lecture Series] - Presented at Saint John's University, Collegeville, MN, October 28, 1999</ref> Dr. Thomas Madden,<ref>Dr. Thomas Madden - [http://www.americanoutlook.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article_detail&id=1691 Crusades of History and Politics] - Hudson Institute, Spring 2002</ref> and the Israeli historian Efraim Karsh,<ref name="TPS">Efraim Karsh - [http://www.nysun.com/arts/perfect-surrender/40266/ The Perfect Surrender] - The New York Sun, September 25, 2006</ref> head of Mediterranean Studies at King's College London, who comments:


{{Quote||Ms. Armstrong goes out of her way to whitewash Muhammad's extermination of the Jewish presence in Medina, especially the beheading of the entire 600 to 800 male population of the Qurayzah tribe. "The Qurayzah were not killed on religious or racial ground," she claims, adding that "Muhammad had no ideological quarrel with the Jewish people." This is of course a travesty of the truth.<ref name="TPS">Efraim Karsh - [http://www.nysun.com/arts/perfect-surrender/40266/ The Perfect Surrender] - The New York Sun, September 25, 2006</ref>}}
{{Quote||Ms. Armstrong goes out of her way to whitewash Muhammad's extermination of the Jewish presence in Medina, especially the beheading of the entire 600 to 800 male population of the Qurayzah tribe. "The Qurayzah were not killed on religious or racial ground," she claims, adding that "Muhammad had no ideological quarrel with the Jewish people." This is of course a travesty of the truth.<ref name="TPS">Efraim Karsh - [http://www.nysun.com/arts/perfect-surrender/40266/ The Perfect Surrender] - The New York Sun, September 25, 2006</ref>}}
Hugh Fitzgerald, the vice-president of and a contributor to Jihad Watch comments on some of her writing, calling it:
{{Quote||...a scandal, consisting almost entirely of baseless assertions, incredible omissions, and complete fabrications. But it is not inexplicable. For Karen Armstrong history does not exist. It is putty in the hands of the person who writes about history. You use it to make a point, to do good as you see it. And whatever you need to twist or omit is justified by the purity of your intentions – and Karen Armstrong always has the purest of intentions. She knows that we in the “white Western world” (as some like to call it) fail to understand others. She knows of our deep need to create “the Other” – a psychic need felt exclusively, and with great intensity, apparently, only by us, and never by anyone else.<ref>Hugh Fitzgerald - [http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm?frm=7158&sec_id=7158 Karen Armstrong: The Coherence of Her Incoherence] - New English Review, May 2007</ref>}}


Similar views are espoused by historian Dr. Thomas Madden. Commenting on one of Karen's books, he says:
Similar views are espoused by historian Dr. Thomas Madden. Commenting on one of Karen's books, he says:
Line 21: Line 20:


{{Quote||because of the so called forgotten dead, 90,000 by allied forces during the attack against Saddam Hussain.}}
{{Quote||because of the so called forgotten dead, 90,000 by allied forces during the attack against Saddam Hussain.}}
Also in April of 2007, Karen Armstrong criticized Robert Spencer and his book "The Truth About Muhammad", accusing him of being ”a hero of the American right” and of writing his books in “hatred”.<ref>Karen Armstrong - [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/4a05a4a4-f134-11db-838b-000b5df10621.html Balancing the Prophet] - Financial Times, April 27, 2007</ref>  Spencer in his response stated:
{{Quote||Uh-oh, "the American right." That's mainstream media code for "a bad guy who should not be accorded respect or taken seriously." This is, of course, a familiar tactic of Leftists, jihadists, and those who sympathize with them: characterize any accurate report of their activities as "hatred." Never mind that my book works strictly from the earliest extant Islamic sources, and only reports what they say. If there is any "hatred" in it, it comes from those sources, not from me.”<ref>Robert Spencer - [http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/016230.php Karen Armstrong reviews Spencer's The Truth About Muhammad!] - Jihad Watch, April 28, 2007</ref>}}
He also highlighted several lies told by Karen Armstrong in regards to the content of his book:
{{Quote|Karen Armstrong|He [Robert Spencer] picks out only those aspects of Islamic tradition that support his thesis. For example, he cites only passages from the [[Quran]] that are hostile to Jews and Christians and does not mention the numerous verses that insist on the continuity of Islam with the People of the Book: ”Say to them: We believe what you believe; your God and our God is one.}}
{{Quote|Robert Spencer|Oh, Karen. Do you really think no one will check your work? Not only do I mention the verse you claim I don't mention (Qur'an 29:46), but I do so twice, on page 17 and again on page 51...Having exposed in The Truth About Muhammad Armstrong's misrepresentation of Tabari's evidence about Aisha's age when she married Muhammad (see page 170), and seeing her false statement above about my not quoting Qur'an 29:46, I am not inclined to take her [at her] word...}}
Karen Armstrong has declined all invitations to debate Robert Spencer.


Some of her other claims include that “until the 20th century, [[Antisemitism|anti-Semitism]] was not part of Islamic culture”, that [[Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Muhammad|Muhammad]] was a “peacemaker” who “respected” Jews and other non-Muslims, and that “until recently, no Muslim thinker had ever claimed [[Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Scholars on Jihad|violent Jihad]] was a central tenet of Islam."
Some of her other claims include that “until the 20th century, [[Antisemitism|anti-Semitism]] was not part of Islamic culture”, that [[Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Muhammad|Muhammad]] was a “peacemaker” who “respected” Jews and other non-Muslims, and that “until recently, no Muslim thinker had ever claimed [[Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Scholars on Jihad|violent Jihad]] was a central tenet of Islam."
Line 44: Line 31:


==External Links==
==External Links==
*[{{Reference archive|1=http://www.newenglishreview.org/Hugh_Fitzgerald/Karen_Armstrong%3A_The_Coherence_of_Her_Incoherence/|2=2011-12-08}} Karen Armstrong: The Coherence of Her Incoherence]
*[http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=4&x_outlet=28&x_article=83 <!-- http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.camera.org%2Findex.asp%3Fx_context%3D4%26x_outlet%3D28%26x_article%3D83&date=2011-12-08 -->Karen Armstrong’s Unscholarly Prejudices]
*[{{Reference archive|1=http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=7978|2=2011-12-08}} Karen Armstrong's Fantasies About Islamic Terror]
*[http://www.nysun.com/arts/perfect-surrender/40266/ The Perfect Surrender]
*[http://www.nysun.com/arts/perfect-surrender/40266/ The Perfect Surrender]
*[{{Reference archive|1=http://davidthompson.typepad.com/davidthompson/2007/02/islams_hagiogra.html|2=2011-12-08}} Islam's Hagiographer]
*[{{Reference archive|1=http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=2475|2=2011-12-08}} The Guardian of Islamic Extremism]
*[{{Reference archive|1=http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/sina/islam_peaceful.htm|2=2011-12-08}} Armstrong's Islam - Does Islam Have a Peaceful Face?]
*[{{Reference archive|1=http://www.faithfreedom.org/op-ed/dhimwit-case-study-karen-armstrong-on-the-nakhla-raid/|2=2011-12-08}} Dhimwit Case Study: Karen Armstrong on the Nakhla Raid]


==References==
==References==
Lightyears
Editors, em-bypass-2, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
2,743

edits

Retrieved from "http://wikiislamica.net/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/135160"

Navigation menu