Internal Rhymes as Evidence for Old Hijazi: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
[checked revision][checked revision]
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 159: Line 159:


==Old Hijazi internal rhymes==
==Old Hijazi internal rhymes==
In 2014, Pierre Larcher was the first to note this sort of internal rhymes in the Quran. He provided two examples. One of them is verse Q96:16 (Case in the Quranic Consonantal Text, p.12)
In 2014, Pierre Larcher was the first to note this sort of internal rhymes in the Quran. He provided two examples. One of them is verse Q96:16 <ref>Previous source, p.12</ref>
﴿‌نَاصِيَةٍ كَاذِبَةٍ خَاطِئَةٍ ۝﴾  
 
“A lying, sinning forelock.
<span dir="rtl" lang="en">﴿‌نَاصِيَةٍ كَاذِبَةٍ خَاطِئَةٍ ۝﴾</span>
)(A lying, sinning forelock.)
 
Classical Arabic pronunciation: nāṣiyatin kādhibatin khāṭiʾah.
Classical Arabic pronunciation: nāṣiyatin kādhibatin khāṭiʾah.
The verse consists of three feminine indefinite words that are in the genitive case so all of them should take the suffix “in”. And since that a suffix is added to a feminine word, the feminine “ah” is turned into “at”:
The verse consists of three feminine indefinite words that are in the genitive case so all of them should take the suffix “in”. And since that a suffix is added to a feminine word, the feminine “ah” is turned into “at”:
nāṣiyah => nāṣiyatin
nāṣiyah => nāṣiyatin
kādhibah => kādhibatin
kādhibah => kādhibatin
As for the last word of the verse, it didn’t take the “in” suffix because the word is at a pausal position, and thus the word stayed in its original form: khāṭiʾah (instead of becoming khāṭiʾatin).
As for the last word of the verse, it didn’t take the “in” suffix because the word is at a pausal position, and thus the word stayed in its original form: khāṭiʾah (instead of becoming khāṭiʾatin).
The three words are spelled in the Quran as:
The three words are spelled in the Quran as:
nāṣiyah kādhibah khāṭiyah.  
nāṣiyah kādhibah khāṭiyah.  
Arab grammarians claim that this spelling is the result of the rule that every word is spelled in its pausal form. But what if these words were pronounced the same way they were spelled? In other words, what if each of these words was pronounced in the pausal form? The result is that the three words would rhyme with each other: nāṣiyah kādhibah khāṭiyah.
Arab grammarians claim that this spelling is the result of the rule that every word is spelled in its pausal form. But what if these words were pronounced the same way they were spelled? In other words, what if each of these words was pronounced in the pausal form? The result is that the three words would rhyme with each other:
The internal rhyme is clear as all of the three words follow the same scheme:  
 
nāṣiyah kādhibah khāṭiyah.
 
The internal rhyme is clear as all of the three words follow the same scheme:
 
Consonant + ā + consonant + i + consonant + ah
Consonant + ā + consonant + i + consonant + ah


Marijn Van Putten discovered a few more internal rhymes, including this general scheme:
Marijn Van Putten discovered a few more internal rhymes, including this general rhyming scheme:
((the epithets of Allah which generally form verse-final internal rhymes in the shape CaC(ī/ū)C in pairs of two, e.g.
p.13
Q2:173, 182, 192 ġafūrun raḥīm /ġafūr raḥīm/ ‘forgiving, merciful’
 
Q4:26; Q8:71; Q9:15 ˁalīmun ḥakīm /ˁalīm ḥakīm/ ‘knowing, wise’
{{Quote|Case in the Quranic Consonantal By Marijn Van Putten, p.13|the epithets of Allah which generally form verse-final internal rhymes in the shape CaC(ī/ū)C in pairs of two, e.g. Q2:173, 182, 192 ġafūrun raḥīm /ġafūr raḥīm/ ‘forgiving, merciful’ Q4:26; Q8:71; Q9:15 ˁalīmun ḥakīm /ˁalīm ḥakīm/ ‘knowing, wise’ Q64:18 al-ˁazīzu l-ḥakīm /al-ˁazīz al-ḥakīm/ ‘the powerful, the wise’ Q35:30, 34; 42:23 ġafūrun šakūr /ġafūr šakūr/ ‘forgiving, appreciative}}
Q64:18 al-ˁazīzu l-ḥakīm /al-ˁazīz al-ḥakīm/ ‘the powerful, the wise’
 
Q35:30, 34; 42:23 ġafūrun šakūr /ġafūr šakūr/ ‘forgiving, appreciative)) p.13
Based on the evidence of internal rhymes in the Quran, Van Putten concludes that the original language of the Quran had the following features that sets it apart from classical Arabic<ref>(Case in the Quranic Consonantal Text, p.13</ref>:


Based on the evidence of internal rhymes in the Quran, Van Putten concludes that the original language of the Quran had the following features that sets it apart from classical Arabic (Case in the Quranic Consonantal Text, p.13) :
1- Lack of nunation.
1- Lack of nunation.
2- Lack of final short vowels except in construct.  
2- Lack of final short vowels except in construct.  
3- The feminine ending is always “ah” and it only turns to “at” in construct.
3- The feminine ending is always “ah” and it only turns to “at” in construct.
4- The indefinite accusative marker is always a long ‘a’ vowel.
4- The indefinite accusative marker is always a long ‘a’ vowel.
5- The third person masculine singular pronoun is always a mere ‘h’ with no vowel attached to it.
5- The third person masculine singular pronoun is always a mere ‘h’ with no vowel attached to it.


==More Old Hijazi internal rhymes in the Quran==
==More Old Hijazi internal rhymes in the Quran==
There are huge number of Old Hijazi internal rhymes that can be found outside of the above mentioned rhymes (link).
Besides the above mentioned rhymes, Idris Al-Arabi discovered a huge number of Old Hijazi internal rhymes that you can sea here.
These internal rhymes can be classified into two categories:
These internal rhymes can be classified into two categories:  
1- Individual instances.  
 
2- Verse-final attributes of Allah, which were already noted by Van Putten but without laying out every unique case of them. There are 32 unique Old Hijazi internal rhymes of this type, 284 with repetition.  
1-Individual instances.  
 
2-Verse-final attributes of Allah, which were already noted by Van Putten but without laying out every unique case of them. There are 32 unique Old Hijazi internal rhymes of this type, 284 with repetition.  


==Special Old Hijazi Internal Rhymes==
==Special Old Hijazi Internal Rhymes==
Autochecked users, em-bypass-1, em-bypass-2, recentchangescleanup
164

edits

Navigation menu