Islamic Views on the Shape of the Earth: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
[checked revision][checked revision]
m (→‎The Earth is flat, but only from a human perspective: Added in two more sentences adding to summarising the argument from a 'human perspective'. Corrected a typo. And added in links to other relevant wikiilsam pages, as well as one to the modern Flat Earth Society which lists these verses, along with many other religions verses as support for their theory - while this is more humorous than 'scholarship', I believe it is fitting in the 'See Also' section as it still drives the point.)
No edit summary
Line 703: Line 703:
This modern reinterpretation of Qur'anic cosmology significantly aligns with modern science and historiography insofar as it understands the intent of the Qur'an to be based on the worldview of the 7th-century Arabian city where it is said to have been produced - that is, as far as Muhammad and his companions were concerned and could tell, the world was indeed flat, and this is the same perspective assumed by the Qur'an. The Qur'an and its first audience did not know the Earth was spherical and did not say as much. This reading of the Qur'an also benefits from not relying on faulty linguistic, historic, and geometric ideas in order to force fit a round earth reading into the verses. This view is the most common amongst educated Muslims today and is likely to predominate going forward.  
This modern reinterpretation of Qur'anic cosmology significantly aligns with modern science and historiography insofar as it understands the intent of the Qur'an to be based on the worldview of the 7th-century Arabian city where it is said to have been produced - that is, as far as Muhammad and his companions were concerned and could tell, the world was indeed flat, and this is the same perspective assumed by the Qur'an. The Qur'an and its first audience did not know the Earth was spherical and did not say as much. This reading of the Qur'an also benefits from not relying on faulty linguistic, historic, and geometric ideas in order to force fit a round earth reading into the verses. This view is the most common amongst educated Muslims today and is likely to predominate going forward.  


On the other hand, critics, in line with academic scholars such as those quoted earlier in this article, argue that the context of most of the relevant verses is expressly the creation of the heavens and the earth and that these are therefore statements about the earth as a whole, even if the main purpose of the verses are to remind the audience how Allah has thereby made the earth traversible and hospitable to humans.  
On the other hand, critics, in line with academic scholars such as those quoted earlier in this article, argue that the context of most of the relevant verses is expressly the creation of the heavens and the earth and that these are therefore statements about the earth as a whole, even if the main purpose of the verses are to remind the audience how Allah has thereby made the earth traversible and hospitable to humans. If the Quranic author had meant something else, critics note that he could easily have stated so explicitly or with further context.
 
If these verses had meant specifically 'from a human perspective' (or with extra context not given anywhere in the text) and not literally, the Quran (as well as 'sahih' hadith), or God as Muslims believe to be doing the writing, could easily have stated so, or just added the context. Also, applying this method means virtually any unscientific text using incorrect human descriptions could rendered truthful.


==See Also==
==See Also==
Editors, em-bypass-2, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
2,743

edits

Navigation menu