Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Rape of Slaves, Prisoners, and Wives: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Added view of prominent modernist scholar for balance
[checked revision][checked revision]
No edit summary
(Added view of prominent modernist scholar for balance)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{QuranHadithScholarsIndex}}
{{QuranHadithScholarsIndex}}


Rape, or az-[[zina]] bil jabr (الزنا بالجبر), is a crime under Islamic law, and the perpetrator is subject to the [[w:hudud|hudud]], that is, capital punishments such as lashing and execution. The Islamic understanding of rape, though, differs markedly from the understanding of rape present in modern codes of law. "Maa malakat aymaanakum"ما ملكت أيمانكم" or "what your right hand possess", that is, [[Slavery in Islamic Law|slaves]], do not have the right to refuse the sexual advances of their owners, and likewise for women taken as booty by victorious Muslim warriors. Wives, similarly, are obliged to accept the sexual advances of their husbands except in certain circumstances such as menstruation or fasting and the Hanafi school of jurisprudence expressly permitted a husband to otherwise force himself on his wife (see [[Rape in Islamic Law]]). As such, the concept of rape was not recognised in [[Islamic law]] for slaves and wives. Rape of another man's slave was treated as property damage for which compensation to her owner was due, and the rapist would receive the [[w:hadd|hadd]] penalty for illegal intercourse. It is a historical fact that sex slavery/concubinage [[Slavery in Islamic Law|occurred on a massive scale]] from the beginnings of Islam almost until the present day. Mainly due to pressure from colonial powers, during the 19th and 20th centuries slavery was abolished across the Muslim world (though persists illegally in a few places such as Mauritania). In many Muslim majority countries marital rape is also now illegal, though is not recognised as a crime in others (especially in the Arab world), which is true also of some non-Muslim countries.
Rape, or az-[[zina]] bil jabr (الزنا بالجبر), is a crime under Islamic law, and the perpetrator is subject to the [[w:hudud|hudud]], that is, capital punishments such as lashing and execution. The Islamic understanding of rape, though, traditionally has some marked differences from the understanding of rape present in modern codes of law. "Maa malakat aymaanakum"ما ملكت أيمانكم" or "what your right hand possess", that is, [[Slavery in Islamic Law|slaves]], did not have the right to refuse the sexual advances of their owners, and likewise for women taken and distributed as booty for victorious Muslim warriors (after a short waiting period to confirm they were not pregrant). Wives, similarly, are obliged to accept the sexual advances of their husbands except in certain circumstances such as menstruation or fasting (see [[Rape in Islamic Law]]). As such, the concept of rape was not recognised in [[Islamic law]] for slaves and wives. Rape of another man's slave was treated as property damage for which compensation to her owner was due, and the rapist would receive the [[w:hadd|hadd]] penalty for illegal intercourse. It is a historical fact that sex slavery/concubinage [[Slavery in Islamic Law|occurred on a massive scale]] from the beginnings of Islam almost until the present day. Mainly due to pressure from colonial powers, during the 19th and 20th centuries slavery was abolished across the Muslim world (though persists illegally in a few places such as Mauritania) and is considered no longer permissable in the modern context by most Islamic scholars. In many Muslim majority countries marital rape is also now illegal, though is not recognised as a crime in others (especially in the Arab world), which is true also of some non-Muslim countries.
{{Main|Rape in Islamic Law|Slavery in Islamic Law}}
{{Main|Rape in Islamic Law|Slavery in Islamic Law}}


Line 99: Line 99:


===Modern Views===
===Modern Views===
Khaled Abou al-Fadl is a prominent reformist scholar who has summarised his understanding of modern Islamic views on slavery:
{{Quote|Khaled Abou al-Fadl, ''The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists''<ref name="alFadl">Khaled Abou al-Fadl, ''The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists'', HarperOne, 2009, p. 255</ref>|Consider, for example, the recent truly ominous and disturbing development by one of the highest-ranking puritan jurists. Shaykh Saleh al-Fawzan, a Saudi jurist, issued a ''fatwa'' (a legal opinion) in which he claimed that not only is slavery lawful in Islam, but that it ought to be legalized in Saudi Arabia. Al-Fawzan went further in accusing Muslim scholars who condemned and outlawed slavery of being ignorant and infidels. This ''fatwa'' is particularly disturbing and dangerous because it effectively legitimates the trafficking in and sexual exploitation of so-called domestic workers in the Gulf region and especially Saudi Arabia.<BR />
The position of slavery had been resolved for most of the twentieth century: slavery was condsidered unlawful and immoral, and all Muslim countries without exception had made the practice illegal. Importantly, most Muslim scholars had reached the reasonable conclusion that slavery is inconsistent with Qur'anic morality and the ethical objectives of the Islamic faith. In short, the prohibition of slavery was considered a closed matter.}}
The IslamQA website presents views from a Saudi based, traditionalist perspective:


{{Quote|1=[http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/33597 Husband forcing his wife to have intercourse]<BR>Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 33597|2=''Question:'' Is it permissible for a man to force his wife or slave to have intercourse if she refuses?.
{{Quote|1=[http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/33597 Husband forcing his wife to have intercourse]<BR>Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 33597|2=''Question:'' Is it permissible for a man to force his wife or slave to have intercourse if she refuses?.
Editors, em-bypass-2, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
2,743

edits

Navigation menu