48,466
edits
User talk:1234567: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Quick question regarding types of sources: new section
(→Quick question regarding types of sources: new section) |
|||
| Line 299: | Line 299: | ||
:Great. Note that the version in the sandbox is an old version (you've made edits to the article after I copy/pasted it). [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 03:59, 1 April 2013 (PDT) | :Great. Note that the version in the sandbox is an old version (you've made edits to the article after I copy/pasted it). [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 03:59, 1 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
== Quick question regarding types of sources == | |||
Hi. Sorry to disturb you but I was wondering if you could help me. In your opinion, would ''The History of al-Tabari'' and Ibn Ishaq's ''Sirat Rasul Allah'' be classed as primary or secondary sources? Also books of fiqh and fatwas use both the Qur'an (primary source) and tafsirs (secondary source?) to formulate their rulings, so wouldn't this make them tertiary sources? [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 05:15, 1 April 2013 (PDT) | |||