WikiIslam:Blocking Policy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Block durations==
==Block Durations==
Edits that ignore guidelines or are intentional vandalism should be blocked for 1-3 months if its an IP address and infinite if its a username.  
Edits that ignore guidelines or are intentional vandalism should be blocked for 1-3 months if its an IP address and infinite if its a username.  


Line 5: Line 5:
Obviously offensive/malicious usernames can blocked indefinitely. If they made a constructive edit, they should be asked for a new username so they can be renamed.
Obviously offensive/malicious usernames can blocked indefinitely. If they made a constructive edit, they should be asked for a new username so they can be renamed.


==Responding to blocked users==
==Responding to Blocked Users==
Reverts for vandalism or ignoring guidelines should be done with no comment or a comment similar to "reverting/reverting vandalism". No other type of comment should be used in the revert.
Reverts for vandalism or ignoring guidelines should be done with no comment or a comment similar to "reverting/reverting vandalism". No other type of comment should be used in the revert.


Line 17: Line 17:
* Continuing to edit after they have been told not to edit (for example if it is clear that a user cannot understand our [[WikiIslam:Policies_and_Guidelines|policies]], has been asked to stop and still continues to edit).
* Continuing to edit after they have been told not to edit (for example if it is clear that a user cannot understand our [[WikiIslam:Policies_and_Guidelines|policies]], has been asked to stop and still continues to edit).


===Examples of incorrect blocks===
===Examples of Incorrect Blocks===
* An editor expressed an opinion we don't agree with: Editors have diverse opinions and they should not be blocked for expressing an opinion unless it is something universally illegal or extreme. Even then, editors can still contribute to this site while having diverse opinions. The first priority is having someone contribute positively to our site's main article space while complying with guidelines. Everything else is secondary.
* An editor expressed an opinion we don't agree with: Editors have diverse opinions and they should not be blocked for expressing an opinion unless it is something universally illegal or extreme. Even then, editors can still contribute to this site while having diverse opinions. The first priority is having someone contribute positively to our site's main article space while complying with guidelines. Everything else is secondary.
* Someone made a mistake/typo or accidental edit
* Someone made a mistake/typo or accidental edit
48,466

edits

Navigation menu