48,466
edits
Talk:Child Marriage in the Qur'an: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Talk:Child Marriage in the Qur'an (view source)
Revision as of 01:34, 22 August 2013
, 22 August 2013Sahih Bukhari hadith: Volume 1, Book 8, number 465
mNo edit summary |
m (Sahih Bukhari hadith: Volume 1, Book 8, number 465) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:Hi. This article has nothing to do with the age of Aisha. The apologetics those Muslims are using, have been refuted in this page: [[Refutation of Modern Muslim Apologetics Against Aishas Age|Refutation of Modern Muslim Apologetics Against Aisha's Age]]. I'm assuming their claim is an exaggeration of what the hadith actually says, in which case I think our response to argument number five covers it. Whatever the case may be, it wouldn't alter the fact that the age of consummation according to multiple (mutawatir) sahih hadith is clearly nine (mutawatir trumps single hadiths, so to speak). [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 18:05, 21 August 2013 (PDT) | :Hi. This article has nothing to do with the age of Aisha. The apologetics those Muslims are using, have been refuted in this page: [[Refutation of Modern Muslim Apologetics Against Aishas Age|Refutation of Modern Muslim Apologetics Against Aisha's Age]]. I'm assuming their claim is an exaggeration of what the hadith actually says, in which case I think our response to argument number five covers it. Whatever the case may be, it wouldn't alter the fact that the age of consummation according to multiple (mutawatir) sahih hadith is clearly nine (mutawatir trumps single hadiths, so to speak). [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 18:05, 21 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
::The hadith is not available on the USC site, so I checked the hard copy (pdf) files and this is what is there for vol. 1, book 8, no. 465: [http://s8.postimg.org/a1tal72md/Sahih_Buk_Vol_1_Book_8_no_465.jpg] It has nothing to do do with Aisha. So unless I'm doing something wrong, the reference they provided was bogus. Not surprising, really. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 18:34, 21 August 2013 (PDT) | |||