Diacritical Marks of the Qur'an: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
(→‎Conclusion: copyedit)
Line 81: Line 81:
==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==


Due to diacritical marks not being included in the original Qur'an and their use being so complex, and also because Muhammad allowed for more than one reading of each word, there is no way to determine the original meaning of the text. Through the abundance of opportunities to make mistakes and of the impossibility of the interpretors getting the correct word it is most likely the Qur'an's had been altered, meaning the version we have with us today is not Allah’s word, to the letter as Muslims claim.
Due to diacritical marks not being included in the original Qur'an and their use being so complex, and also because Muhammad allowed for more than one reading of each word, there is no way to determine the original meaning of the text. Through the abundance of opportunities to make mistakes and because of the impossibility of the interpreters getting the correct word, it is most likely true that the Qur'an had been altered and the version we have with us today is not Allah’s word, to the letter as Muslims claim.


{{Core Scripture}}
{{Core Scripture}}
==See Also==
==See Also==
* [[Arabic letters and diacritics]]
* [[Arabic letters and diacritics]]
em-bypass-2
1,979

edits

Navigation menu