Editors, em-bypass-2
4,744
edits
Prophecies in the Hadith: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Conquest of Rome
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Prekladator (talk | contribs) |
Prekladator (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 906: | Line 906: | ||
Either Muhammad meant the whole Roman Empire, in that case prophecy failed, because the Roman Empire no longer exists and it wasn't conquered by Muslims. Or he meant the Syrian territory (although it's not in Arabic version of the hadith) and in that case the prophecy also failed, because the Dajjal didn't appear after it. | Either Muhammad meant the whole Roman Empire, in that case prophecy failed, because the Roman Empire no longer exists and it wasn't conquered by Muslims. Or he meant the Syrian territory (although it's not in Arabic version of the hadith) and in that case the prophecy also failed, because the Dajjal didn't appear after it. | ||
===Conquest of India with the second coming of Jesus=== | |||
Also known as [[Ghazwa-e-hind|ghazwa-e-hind]]. | |||
{{Quote|{{Al Nasai||1|25|3177}} (hasan) from The Book of Jihad, chapter "Invading India"| | |||
It was narrated that Thawban, the freed slave of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), said: | |||
"The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: 'There are two groups of my Ummah whom Allah will free from the Fire: The group that invades India (تَغْزُو الْهِنْدَ, ''taghzoo al-hind''), and the group that will be with Isa bin Maryam, peace be upon him.'" | |||
}} | |||
Early conquests of India happened in the 7th century (for example [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Rasil Battle of Rasil]), while author of the hadith collection [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Nasa%27i al-Nasa'i] lived in the 9th century. | |||
The conquest of India is linked to the second coming of Jesus (Isa). In other (although weak) hadiths it's even more explicit: | |||
{{Quote|Na‘eem ibn Hammaad, al-Fitan, p. 409 (daeef)| | |||
The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said – and he mentioned India – then he said: “An army of yours will invade India and Allah will grant its conquest to them, until they bring their kings in chains, and Allah will forgive them their sins. Then they will return and when they return, they will find the son of Maryam in ash-Shaam (Syria).” Abu Hurayrah said: If I live to see that campaign, I will sell everything I possess and join the campaign. Then if Allah grants us victory and we return, then I will be Abu Hurayrah the freed (protected from Hellfire). And when we return to Syria we will find there ‘Eesa ibn Maryam. Then I shall make sure that I draw close to him and tell him that I accompanied you, O Messenger of Allah. The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) smiled and said: “Unlikely, unlikely.” [very difficult?] | |||
}} | |||
But the second coming didn't come after the conquests, so scholars say that the prophesized conquest didn't happen yet: | |||
{{Quote|[https://islamqa.info/en/answers/145636/hadith-about-the-conquest-of-india islamqa.info: Hadith about the conquest of India]| | |||
What is mentioned in the hadith of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah have mercy on him), which was narrated by Na‘eem ibn Hammaad, about '''the conquest of India has not happened up till now''', but it will happen when ‘Eesaa ibn Maryam (peace be upon him) descends, if the hadith that says that is saheeh. | |||
}} | |||
====Nations will soon call each other to attack Muslims==== | ====Nations will soon call each other to attack Muslims==== | ||