48,466
edits
[checked revision] | [checked revision] |
mNo edit summary |
m (→Conclusion) |
||
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
It is apparent that folkloric tales about the creation of humans from clay/earth/mud is very common. So, does the modern | It is apparent that folkloric tales about the creation of humans from clay/earth/mud is very common. So, does the modern scientific hypothesis of the role of clay in abiogenesis prove the validity of the religions of the ancient Mesopotamians, the ancient Egyptians, the African peoples of Silluk and Pangwe, the Amerindians, the Karens of Burma, or the Incas? | ||
Is Khnum the true god? Or Nammu, Viracocha, Juok, Chinigchinich or Pund-jel? Why do Muslims believe [[Allah]] to be the true god as 'suggested' by the clay abiogenesis hypothesis? It could well be the ram-headed Elephantine god Khnum who really did create human beings from clay. | Is Khnum the true god? Or Nammu, Viracocha, Juok, Chinigchinich or Pund-jel? Why do Muslims believe [[Allah]] to be the true god as 'suggested' by the clay abiogenesis hypothesis? It could well be the ram-headed Elephantine god Khnum who really did create human beings from clay. | ||
{{Core Science}} | {{Core Science}} | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
edits